Tariq Akilah
Project 04 / Certification Next / Motorized Trike →

High-Power
Certification Flight


Designed and FDM-printed a PETG-CF airframe on a Bambu Lab P1S, holding geometric symmetry under simulated flight loads at under 600 grams. Flew a stable Mach 0.747 profile to 4,600 ft and recovered it without critical damage to earn NAR Level 1 certification.

Images below
Team
Personal build
Role
Designer and fabricator
Scope
Full airframe design, printing, and flight, pre-certified by a NAR Level 3 mentor before launch
Constraints
NAR high-power requirements, under 600 grams, geometric symmetry under OpenRocket-simulated flight loads
Tools
Fusion 360, OpenRocket, FDM (PETG-CF, Bambu Lab P1S)
Status
Stable Mach 0.747 flight to 4,600 ft, recovered without critical damage, NAR Level 1 High-Power Certification earned

Objective

The goal was to design, manufacture, launch, and recover a rocket to earn my National Association of Rocketry (NAR) Level 1 High-Power Certification. Beyond that, I set my own performance target: keep the airframe under 600 grams without giving up the structural rigidity a high-power motor demands.

Getting there meant clearing two separate bars. The airframe had to meet all NAR high-power requirements and pass a preflight inspection from a NAR Level 3 member, and the flight itself had to end in a recovery clean enough to leave no flight-critical damage. Missing either one meant the attempt failed, regardless of how well the rest of the build performed.

Approach

Modeled the airframe in OpenRocket first, then moved into Fusion 360 to design the individual components for FDM printing. I tested a few different fin geometries and thicknesses, as well as print materials before settling on PETG-CF. It held up under simulated flight loads without pushing the rocket over the 600 gram target.

The first launch attempt failed on recovery. The parachute detached from the airframe, and the rocket free-fell and could not be recovered. I redesigned the fin can from the ground up, integrating the recovery system and motor retainer into one design. I ran the shock cord the full length of the fin can and looped it back around itself so there was no way for it to separate from the airframe short of actually cutting it.

OpenRocket single-stage layout diagram with mass, apogee, and velocity readouts
Fig. 01 / Airframe layout, OpenRocket
Nose cone CAD model in Fusion 360
Fig. 02 / Nose cone, Fusion 360
Fin can CAD model in Fusion 360
Fig. 03 / Fin can, Fusion 360
Fin can section view in Fusion 360, showing wall thickness and motor mount tube
Fig. 04 / Fin can, section view

Result

The redesigned recovery system held up perfectly on the second attempt. The rocket flew a stable profile to Mach 0.747 and 4,600 ft, then came down and was recovered without any flight-critical damage.

That flight, combined with a preflight inspection from a NAR Level 3 mentor covering structural rigidity, construction and assembly, and motor retention and tolerancing, earned me my NAR Level 1 High-Power Certification, meeting the objective in full.

Fig. 05 / L1 certification flight
Airframe and recovery gear after flight and recovery
Fig. 06 / Airframe, post-flight and recovery